STUFF AND NONSENSE
I suppose it's remotely possible the charges arevalid. But the story doesn't add up. It seems far more plausible fromthe accounts I'm reading that this woman, who had no prior criminalrecord and a clean teaching history, was using an insecure edition ofInternet Explorer and was hit with an adware infestation she didn'tknow how to deal with.
Some reports indicate the teachers at this school wereprohibited by policy from turning off school computers, which wouldanswer the "why didn't she just shut down the PC?" questions. Amerotestified that she told four other teachers and the school's assistantprincipal about the popup problem, and nobody responded with help. Theschool's internet filter license had expired, and the detective in theinvestigation was quoted in one local paper's account as saying "therewas no search made for adware, which can generate pop-upadvertisements". So if that's true, and the arguments of the defenseare valid -- wow, 40 years in jail for using a lame browser? Insane.That's more time than some convicted murderers get.
No comments:
Post a Comment